Fossilized words

What in tarnation?! How can a word be a fossil?


Published on October 19, 2026


Image: New Africa

You use them every single day: "without further ado," "to no avail," "at your beck and call." But do you know what "ado" actually means, or who’s doing the "beckoning"? Like many others, these are fossil words, pieces of language that vanished from everyday English centuries ago, except for one lucky phrase that kept them alive. Some come from Shakespeare, some from Old English assemblies, and one even comes from a word for murderous rage. These 10 everyday expressions have some wonderfully strange stories behind them.

1

Tarnation

Image: PeopleImages

If someone in an old Western says, "What in tarnation?!" the expression sounds unmistakably American, but "tarnation" was never a straightforward everyday noun like table or horse.

It arose in the late 18th century as a euphemistic alteration of damnation. Dictionary sources date its first recorded use to about 1775 to 1785 and connect it with forms such as tarnal, itself a dialectal pronunciation of eternal, and darnation. The point was to express surprise, irritation, or anger without using a stronger oath. Today, tarnation mostly survives in comic, folksy, deliberately old-fashioned speech, especially in phrases such as "what in tarnation?" It sounds quaint now because the softer substitute outlived the profanity it was designed to avoid.

2

Avail

Image: CeltStudio

"All to no avail" sounds perfectly natural, but try using avail in an ordinary sentence, and you may suddenly sound like you wandered out of an old novel.

The noun dates to Middle English and developed from an obsolete form related to the idea of being useful or valuable (think of available), ultimately connected to Old French valoir, "to be worth." For centuries, avail could refer to usefulness or advantage. Modern English has largely pushed it into formal expressions such as "to no avail," "of little avail," and "of no avail." The word has not vanished completely, but it has become much less comfortable outside those familiar constructions.

3

Moot

Image: WINDCOLORS

Moot has one of the strangest journeys on this list because its older meaning was almost the opposite of the way many people use it today.

The word goes back to Old English mōt, an assembly or meeting, related to the idea of coming together. By the 16th century, "moot" was associated with legal students discussing hypothetical cases, which helped produce the sense of something open to debate. In modern American English, however, a "moot point" can mean an issue that no longer matters or is not worth considering. The older debate-related meaning also survives, so context matters. If a canceled policy makes an argument irrelevant, calling it moot is quite different from saying the issue is still open for discussion.

4

Beck

Image: Sharaf Maksumov

"At your beck and call" is such a familiar expression that it is easy to assume beck must still be an ordinary word. It is not, at least in the sense used here.

Beck comes from Middle English and means a gesture or signal of summons, essentially a shortened form related to beckon. The American Heritage Dictionary defines it as a gesture of beckoning. The phrase "beck and call" has been around for centuries, with a recorded example in Emilia Lanier’s 1611 poetry collection Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum. That makes "beck and call" a linguistic time capsule: one half remains common, while the other survives mainly because the two were paired.

5

Amok

Image: chrisdorney

"Run amok" may sound like a playful way to describe the kids tearing through the house or a shopping cart going wild in a crowded store. The word’s original story was much darker.

English borrowed amok in the 17th century through Portuguese from Malay amok, meaning a rushing frenzy. Early English descriptions used it for a person in a violent, murderous frenzy. By the late 17th century, amok was also being used as an adverb, and the phrase "run amok" developed from there. Modern English has softened the everyday use considerably. We now use it for people, machines, plans, or situations that become wildly uncontrolled, even when nobody is in danger. The word survived, but its everyday meaning changed dramatically.

6

Ado

Image: MAFPHOTOART8

Think of the phrase you hear before someone gets to the point: "without further ado."

Ado dates to late Middle English and originally meant action, business, fuss, or activity. Oxford traces it to northern Middle English at do, an older way of forming an infinitive, which eventually became the single word ado. By Shakespeare’s time, it was familiar enough to appear in the title Much Ado About Nothing, first published in 1600. Today, you can still meet ado on its own in literary or formal writing, but ordinary conversation overwhelmingly keeps it in the set phrase.

7

Figment

Image: Casimiro PT

If you have ever told someone that something was "just a figment of your imagination," you have used a word with a surprisingly old passport.

Figment first appeared in English around 1400 to 1450, from Latin figmentum, meaning something made or feigned. In other words, the original idea was something fashioned or invented, not necessarily something sinister or imaginary. Over the centuries, figment narrowed toward the idea of something imagined or fabricated. Today, dictionaries still recognize it as a normal noun, but its most familiar home is the phrase "figment of the imagination."

8

Bide

Image: Dominik Bruhn

You probably recognize "bide your time," especially from older books, movies, or a piece of advice from someone who knew that patience could pay off.

Bide is much older than the phrase. It comes from Old English bīdan, meaning to stay, remain, endure, or wait, and it had many uses in earlier forms of English. Over time, other words replaced that meaning, while bide survived especially well in the expression "bide your time," which means to wait patiently for the best moment to take action. It still appears occasionally outside that phrase, particularly in dialectal or literary English, but it feels distinctly old-fashioned to most.

9

Nother

Image: PX Media

"That’s a whole nother story" may make a grammar teacher wince, but the history of nother is more interesting than the phrase suggests.

Modern dictionaries describe it as an informal American adjective meaning "other," usually appearing in "a whole nother." It comes from a reanalysis of another, as if speakers heard "an other" and treated nother as a separate word. That interpretation is not entirely fanciful: older English really did use "a nother" as a form of "an other," with examples dating back centuries. The older form eventually became obsolete, but the split survived in American colloquial speech. So "a whole nother" is not simply a random modern mistake.

10

Fro

Image: TungCheung

You still hear "to and fro" in conversation, but ask someone to use fro by itself and the language suddenly feels centuries older.

Fro comes from Old Norse and entered English as a word meaning "away" or "backwards." Etymological records trace it to around 1200, while "to and fro," meaning forward and backward, appears by the mid-14th century. Over time, from became the normal everyday counterpart, leaving fro with very little independent life in modern English. It has not disappeared entirely, since it can still appear in dialects and formal or literary writing, but the paired expression is by far its most familiar home.


Translation and interpretation

Was the forbidden fruit really an apple? 10 Bible surprises


Published on October 19, 2026


Image: Mariordo, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

What if some of the Bible stories you grew up with aren't exactly what the Bible says? Was the forbidden fruit really an apple? Were there actually three Wise Men? Did "God helps those who help themselves" really come from the Bible? Over centuries, translations, traditions, and famous works of art have added details that became so familiar, we stopped questioning them. But go back to the texts, and some of these stories look surprisingly different. From Eve's "apple" to the date of Jesus' birth, here are 10 familiar parts of the Bible that may not be quite what we remember.

1

The forbidden fruit was an apple

Image: Albrecht Dürer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

When you picture the Garden of Eden, what fruit comes to mind? Most people imagine an apple, but there's just one problem: the Bible never says it was an apple.

In the Book of Genesis, the fruit is simply called "the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil." The original Hebrew text uses the word peri, which simply means "fruit." The apple connection came centuries later, largely through the Latin translation. The Latin word malum can mean both "apple" and "evil," making it an especially fitting symbol for the story. Over time, that association spread through Christian art and literature. Famous works such as Albrecht Dürer’s 1504 engraving Adam and Eve (also known as The Fall of Man) helped cement the image of Eve holding an apple. Today, it's one of the most famous scenes in history, even though the original biblical text doesn’t identify the fruit as an apple at all.

2

There were three wise men/kings

Image: Rawpixel.com

The story of Jesus' birth is so famous that most of us picture the Three Wise Men, sometimes called the Three Kings, standing beside the manger. But the thing is, over the centuries, the story picked up a few details that aren't actually in the Bible.

In the Gospel of Matthew, the only Gospel that mentions these visitors, they are described simply as Magi from the East. The original Greek word, magoi, referred to learned scholars, astrologers, or priests from Persia or Babylon, not kings. But where did the number three come from? Matthew lists three gifts: gold, frankincense, and myrrh, but never says how many visitors brought them. Over the centuries, people naturally assumed there must have been three Magi, one for each gift. Even their familiar names, Melchior, Caspar, and Balthasar, were added later by Christian tradition. So, neither the number of visitors nor their names appears anywhere in the biblical text.

3

"God helps those who help themselves"

Image: Adam Nir

Whether it's used to motivate a friend, encourage a family member, or push yourself to finally make a difficult decision, "God helps those who help themselves" is one of the most familiar religious sayings in America. But here's the surprise: those words never appear in the Bible.

The idea can be traced to ancient Greek sources, including Aesop’s Fables, where the saying appears in an earlier form: "The gods help them that help themselves." The exact modern wording was written by English politician Algernon Sidney in 1698, but it was Benjamin Franklin who helped make it part of American culture when he included it in his 1736 edition of Poor Richard’s Almanack.

4

"Cleanliness is next to godliness"

Image: John Jackson, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Many teenagers have heard "Cleanliness is next to godliness" when it was time to clean their rooms. But despite sounding like a Bible verse, the phrase never appears in Scripture.

The Bible, particularly Leviticus, does contain extensive laws requiring people to wash their bodies and clothes in certain circumstances, especially before religious rituals. But the famous saying itself came much later. In 1605, Francis Bacon wrote in The Advancement of Learning that "cleanness of body" was connected to reverence for God. Then, in 1786, it was Methodist leader John Wesley who used the wording we recognize today in a sermon: "Cleanliness is indeed next to Godliness." Over time, the phrase became a familiar saying that many people simply assumed came from the Bible.

5

The date of Jesus' birth

Image: http://www.parrocchiasantagata.org, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

When it comes to famous dates, December 25 may be the most recognizable of all, universally associated with Christmas. But here's the surprising part: the Bible never gives any specific date for Jesus' birth.

The Gospels of Matthew and Luke describe the Nativity but never provide a calendar date, so how did December 25 become Christmas? There are two leading theories. The first is that the Roman Church was celebrating Christmas on December 25 by 336 AD, during Constantine's reign, possibly choosing the date to coincide with existing Roman winter festivals and make it easier to convert the empire to Christianity. The second points to an early Christian tradition that calculated Jesus' birth date from the supposed date of his crucifixion, eventually arriving at December 25.

6

Jonah and the Whale

Image: Pieter Lastman, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

The story of Jonah and the Whale is so famous that it has appeared literally or symbolically in innumerable works of art and literature, from Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel ceiling (1508-1512) to Herman Melville's 1851 novel Moby-Dick. But there's a small problem with the title we've given it: the Bible doesn’t actually say it was a whale.

In the Old Testament, the original Hebrew text of Jonah 1:17 uses the words dag gadol, meaning "great fish" or "large fish"; it doesn't identify the creature as a whale, or even specify what kind of fish it was. Most modern English translations therefore stick with "great fish," but the familiar "whale" interpretation developed through older translations and later European tradition, eventually becoming so widespread that "Jonah and the Whale" became the name almost everyone recognizes.

7

The serpent in Eden was Satan

Image: neurobit

Just as we've always pictured the forbidden fruit as an apple, many of us also assume the serpent in the Garden of Eden is the devil himself. But the original story is a little more complicated.

A plain reading of Genesis depicts the creature simply as a serpent or snake, using the Hebrew word nachash. It describes the serpent as clever and crafty, but it never calls it Satan or explicitly identifies it as the devil. So where did the connection come from? The answer comes from later parts of the Bible, particularly the New Testament. In Revelation 12:9 and 20:2, Satan is called "the ancient serpent" (ho ophis ho archaios in Greek), connecting him to the snake of Eden. Over time, Christian tradition applied that later connection back to Genesis, leading to the familiar belief that the serpent was Satan himself.

8

Delilah Cut Samson’s Hair

Image: Georg Pencz, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

Many of us remember Samson for his legendary strength and the long hair that was said to be the source of his power. His story with Delilah is one of the Bible's most famous tales of betrayal, but there's one detail some people may have gotten wrong: Delilah didn't actually cut his long hair.

In Judges 16:19, Delilah has Samson's hair shaved while he sleeps on her lap. The text says she called for a man to do the shaving; it never says she did it herself. Yet paintings, films, and other retellings have often shown Delilah wielding the scissors herself, cementing that image in popular culture. It can be considered a small detail, but it’s a great example of how easily familiar Bible stories can pick up elements that aren't actually in the original text.

9

The Bible is a single-voice book

Image: Pixel-Shot

Many of us think of the Bible as a single book, written at one particular time by one author, or perhaps a handful of them. After all, that's how it looks when you pick one up in a hotel room, but its history is far more complicated.

The Bible is actually a collection of books written by over 40 authors over roughly 1,500 years, from about 1400 BC to AD 100. The exact number of books varies by religious tradition: Protestant Bibles contain 66 books, while Catholic and Orthodox traditions include additional books. Across these different traditions, the writings were produced by kings, prophets, fishermen, and scholars in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. They also span a tremendous range of literary styles, including history, poetry, songs, laws, letters, and prophecy. So while we hold it as one book today, the Bible is actually a collection of many different writings produced across centuries.

10

Original manuscripts still exist

Image: https://www.themorgan.org/manuscript/350198, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Many people assume that at least a few original fragments of the Bible must still exist somewhere. It would be incredible if they did, but none of the original manuscripts, known as autographs, have survived.

The earliest biblical texts were written on fragile materials such as papyrus and animal skins, which could deteriorate through humidity, heat, handling, and simple age. Wars, fires, and other destruction also contributed to their disappearance. So how do we know what the originals said? Through a technique called textual criticism: expert scholars compare thousands of handwritten copies, ancient translations, and quotations from early Christian writers. When they find passages that match across different sources, or differences that reveal how a text changed over time, they can work backward to determine what the original most likely said, even though the original manuscripts themselves are gone.

Looking for an extra scoop of literary fun?

Learn more with our Word of the day

sage

/seɪdʒ/