Decoding the experts

You’ve heard your doctor use these words. Here’s what they really mean


Published on June 15, 2026


Image: Vitaly Gariev

Medical jargon can be somewhat confusing to the untrained ear. How can something negative or unremarkable be reassuring? If you’ve ever felt like you needed a translator during a medical appointment, you’re not alone. Curious about what your physician is really saying? Let’s break it down.

1

Artery vs. vein

Image: Robina Weermeijer

During a routine visit, your doctor might talk about keeping your arteries healthy. And later, when you get your blood draw, the technician mentions your veins. It’s easy to wonder how these two are related.

Arteries carry oxygen-rich blood from the heart to the body. They handle higher pressure and have thicker walls. They are in charge of delivering blood to every other organ.

Veins, instead, return blood to the heart after oxygen has been delivered. They work under lower pressure than the arteries. Conditions affecting them vary greatly, and knowing the difference allows any patient to understand what is really going on behind that lab result.

2

Electrocardiogram vs. echocardiogram

Image: Joachim Schnürle

Heart testing can involve several procedures, and the names don’t always make it clear what each one does. An electrocardiogram, or EKG, records the electrical activity of the heart. It helps detect irregular rhythms and signs of past damage. For instance, if someone feels palpitations, an EKG might be the first test ordered.

An echocardiogram uses ultrasound to create images of the heart’s structure and movement. It’s helpful to see blood flow through the heart and heart valves. Both tests look at the heart, but they focus on different aspects.

3

Hypothyroidism vs. hyperthyroidism

Image: El S

When it comes to thyroid conditions, a small prefix makes a big difference. Hypothyroidism means the thyroid is underactive and produces too little hormone, leading to symptoms like fatigue or feeling cold more often.

Hyperthyroidism, on the other hand, means it is overactive and produces too much hormone, causing the opposite effect and speeding up your system. This can lead to weight loss or rapid heartbeats. Because the symptoms and treatments differ, it’s important to know which condition is being described, even though the terms sound similar.

4

​Dose vs. dosage

Image: Olga DeLawrence

Prescription labels often include both of these terms, and their writing is very similar, but that doesn’t mean they are interchangeable.

A "dose" is the specific amount taken at one time, like a pill or 10 milligrams. "Dosage" is the overall plan. It includes how much to take, how often, and for how long. Following both correctly helps ensure the treatment works as intended.

5

Positive vs. negative

Image: Brett Jordan

Imagine opening your lab results and seeing the word "negative." In everyday language, that sounds like bad news, but in medicine, it often means the opposite.

In medical testing, "negative" usually means no sign of the condition was found. For example, a negative strep test means you don’t have a strep infection. A "positive," however, means something was detected, and it confirms the presence of the condition. It’s a simple switch in meaning, but it can feel confusing at first.

6

Normal vs. ​unremarkable

Image: National Cancer Institute

When reading test results, many people look for the word "normal." If they don’t see it, they may feel uneasy. But "normal" is not the only word that can describe healthy scenarios.

In medicine, "normal" means everything appears exactly as expected. No unusual findings, nothing to worry about. "Unremarkable," another word you might find in test results, is not necessarily a bad word. In general, it means whatever findings there may be, there’s nothing that requires follow-up. Despite how it sounds, "unremarkable" can be just as reassuring as "normal."

7

Aural vs. oral

Image: National Cancer Institute

You pick up a prescription labeled "for aural use." It looks familiar, but something feels off. Is it the same as oral? This mix-up happens because, in English, the words sound identical, but they refer to different parts of the body.

"Aural" relates to the ears and is used for treatments like ear drops. On the other side, "oral" refers to the mouth, including medication you swallow or let dissolve.

A medication labeled for aural use is designed specifically for the ear canal and should not be taken by mouth. When instructions aren’t clear, it’s always worth double-checking before using the medication.

8

Physiologic vs. pathologic

Image: Vitaly Gariev

Medical reports often include terms that sound technical and unfamiliar. Take "physiologic," it sounds pretty similar to "pathologic," so should one worry? Let’s see the difference.

"Physiologic" refers to normal body functions. It describes processes that occur as part of a healthy system. "Pathologic" is the opposite; it refers to changes caused by disease or abnormal conditions. Doctors use these terms to separate what is expected from what may require treatment. But even if both sound equally serious at first, your physician is the only one who can actually tell you if your hunch is right or not.

9

​​Chronic vs. acute

Image: National Cancer Institute

The word "chronic" often carries a heavy tone, even though its meaning is more straightforward than it seems. Funny enough, the opposite, "acute," seems light, but it generally isn’t.

"Chronic" refers to a condition that lasts for a long period, usually one year or longer. It doesn’t refer to severity, but duration. "Acute," instead, refers to a condition that develops suddenly and requires immediate attention. These terms describe timing, not seriousness, which is an important distinction when discussing a diagnosis.

10

Hypertension vs. hypotension

Image: National Cancer Institute

Similar to the thyroid, blood pressure discussions often include terms that sound nearly identical, which can make them easy to confuse.

"Hypertension" means high blood pressure, and it’s linked to long-term health concerns if not managed. "Hypotension" means low blood pressure, which may cause symptoms like dizziness, but it’s often less worrying. Understanding the difference helps make sense of your readings and what your doctor is monitoring over time.


When the real drama happened off-screen

Movies with behind-the-scenes stories better than the plot


Published on June 15, 2026


Image: Adi Goldstein

Some movies are memorable for what happens on screen. Others? Well, let's just say the real show was happening behind the camera. From explosive feuds to total meltdowns, these ten productions were a mess—and honestly, that makes them even more fascinating. Grab some popcorn and enjoy the chaos.

1

Cleopatra (1963)

Image: r2hox from Madrid, Spain, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

This epic was supposed to be Hollywood's crown jewel. Instead, it nearly bankrupted 20th Century Fox. The budget spiraled from $2 million to over $44 million—the equivalent of hundreds of millions today. Elizabeth Taylor fell seriously ill, sets were scrapped and rebuilt, and the production moved from London to Rome.

And then there was the love affair. Taylor and her co-star Richard Burton fell head over heels for each other—while both were married to other people. The scandal made headlines worldwide. The movie became the highest-grossing film of the year, but its massive budget meant it struggled to turn a profit and was a box office disappointment. The gossip? Priceless.

2

The Wizard of Oz (1939)

Image: Jon Tyson

This beloved classic looks like pure magic on screen, but behind the curtain, it was anything but. The original Tin Man actor had to be replaced after the aluminum dust in his makeup nearly killed him. Judy Garland, just 16 at the time, was put on a strict diet by the studio and given pills to keep her energy up—a troubling practice that haunted her for years.

Multiple directors came and went during filming. There were costume accidents, on-set injuries, and the actors playing the flying monkeys reportedly terrorized cast members. It's a wonder the yellow brick road led anywhere at all.

3

Apocalypse Now (1979)

Image: Specna Arms

Director Francis Ford Coppola went to the Philippines to make a war film—and essentially ended up living one. The shoot stretched from a planned six weeks to over a year. Marlon Brando arrived overweight and completely unprepared. Martin Sheen suffered a heart attack mid-production. A typhoon destroyed the sets.

Coppola himself had a nervous breakdown and threatened to quit. The documentary about the making of the film, Hearts of Darkness, is arguably more gripping than the movie itself. That's saying something, because the movie is considered one of the greatest ever made.

4

Jaws (1975)

Image: Wai Siew

Steven Spielberg's thriller almost sank before it ever hit the water. The mechanical shark—nicknamed "Bruce" by the crew—malfunctioned constantly in the saltwater. It looked ridiculous, broke down every other day, and production on the water was a nightmare from the start.

But Spielberg turned the disaster into a stroke of genius. Unable to show the shark, he built suspense through music (John Williams’ score became iconic) and reaction shots instead. The result was one of the most terrifying movies ever made. Sometimes your problems solve themselves—or at least make for a better film.

5

Gone With the Wind (1939)

Image: Selznick International Pictures, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Finding Scarlett O'Hara was a two-year circus. Over 1,400 women were tested for the role before Vivien Leigh was cast—famously just days before filming began. Director George Cukor was fired early on, reportedly because Clark Gable didn't like him, and Victor Fleming took over (while also directing The Wizard of Oz that same year—the man was busy).

On set, tensions ran high between the stars, the producers, and pretty much everyone else. Leigh and Olivia de Havilland both clashed with the production at various points. Still, the film won eight Academy Awards. Hollywood was always good at keeping its scandals off the official record.

6

Chinatown (1974)

Image: Hongjin Wang

This noir classic had real-life darkness lurking behind it. Director Roman Polanski and writer Robert Towne argued bitterly over the ending—Towne wanted something hopeful, while Polanski insisted on tragedy. Polanski won, and the bleak final scene became one of the most memorable in cinema history.

Then there was the tension between Jack Nicholson and Faye Dunaway. By most accounts, they did not get along. Dunaway allegedly threw a cup of urine at Polanski during a dispute about her hair. Nicholson was reportedly frustrated for reasons too numerous to list. And yet somehow, they made magic.

7

Titanic (1997)

Image: NOAA

James Cameron has a well-earned reputation for being, let's say, intense on set. During the making of Titanic, crew members were reportedly pushed to exhaustion, shooting in freezing water tanks for hours on end. At one point, someone spiked the crew's clam chowder with PCP—yes, really—sending dozens of people to the hospital.

Cameron himself was so difficult to work with that a crew member reportedly wore a T-shirt reading, "You Can't Scare Me, I Work for James Cameron." The budget ballooned to $200 million, making it the most expensive film ever made at the time. It also became the highest-grossing film in history. So he gets to keep being intense, apparently.

8

The Exorcist (1973)

Image: Josh Eckstein

From day one, this film felt cursed, and the cast and crew weren't shy about saying so. There were mysterious fires, set accidents, and a string of deaths connected to people involved in the production. Jack MacGowran and Vasiliki Maliaros, who both played characters that died in the film, passed away before it was even released.

Linda Blair, just 14 when she played the possessed Regan, suffered a back injury during a violent scene that caused problems for years. Director William Friedkin reportedly fired a gun on set to provoke a shocked reaction from actors. Audiences fainted in theaters. The making of this one was as unsettling as the film itself.

9

The African Queen (1951)

Image: BSLRed, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Humphrey Bogart and Katharine Hepburn were not exactly natural companions, and filming deep in Africa didn't help. The cast and crew battled dysentery, insects, heat, and flooding rivers throughout the shoot. Director John Huston insisted on eating and drinking whatever the locals offered—and stayed perfectly healthy.

Bogart and Hepburn, however, were miserable. She reportedly hated every minute in Africa, while he found the whole experience rather amusing. The creative tension between them, though, translated beautifully on screen. Their performances earned both actors Academy Award nominations, which goes to show that suffering is sometimes good for art.

10

Waterworld (1995)

Image: Noah Buscher

Before it became a punchline, Waterworld was already a catastrophe in progress. Filming entirely on the ocean turned out to be as chaotic as it sounds. The sets broke apart and sank. The weather was brutal. Costs ran so far over budget that it became the most expensive film ever made at the time, a title it held until Titanic came along.

Kevin Costner and director Kevin Reynolds had a very public falling out, with Reynolds quitting before the film was finished. The press had a field day calling it "Kevin's Gate" and "Fishtar." The movie was actually decent, but the behind-the-scenes disaster overshadowed everything. Some films just can't escape their own reputation.

Looking for an extra scoop of literary fun?

Learn more with our Word of the day

tangential

/tænˈdʒɛn(t)ʃ(ə)l/