Common slip-ups

You need to know this! The truth about how these 10 words are used


Published on March 16, 2025


Image: JESHOOTS.COM

We all slip up from time to time, but it turns out that some errors are more common than others, especially when it comes to reading and writing. Of course, there is no "unique" way to use language, but even if we've spoken English since childhood, there are still common "mistakes" that native speakers tend to make. Read on to see if you make any of these too!

1

There/their/they're

Image: Nick Fewings

Ever received a message that reads, "I love they're new house"? Homophones are words that sound the same (or very, very similar), and this is the case with "there," "their," and "they're," which is why many native speakers tend to confuse them.

However, these three words have quite different meanings and functions. "There" can be used with the verb to be, as in "There's a problem with your order," or as an adverb to indicate place: "I found the cat; it's there!" On the other hand, "their" functions as a possessive, indicating ownership, as in "I love their new house." Finally, "they're" is a contraction of "they are," as in "They're a lovely couple."

2

Your/you're

Image: Markus Spiske

You've probably written or read something like "I think your right about that" or "I'd love to meet you're parents." These usages are considered incorrect, but don't worry—you’re not alone! Like the words in the previous entry, "your" and "you're" are homophones, meaning they sound identical when spoken.

To understand them better, remember that "you're" is a contraction of "you are" (pronoun + verb), as in "You're the best friend I ever had." Meanwhile, "your" is a possessive adjective, which indicates that something belongs to "you."

3

Fewer/less

Image: the blowup

This case is different from the previous ones. The common confusion between "fewer" and "less" has nothing to do with pronunciation but rather with meaning, as both are quantifiers used for comparisons and indicate a smaller quantity.

The key is knowing which type of noun each word should be used with. "Fewer" is used with countable nouns (things you can count individually), as in "He made fewer mistakes this time." On the other hand, "less" is used with uncountable nouns (things you can't count individually, as they are considered a whole), such as in "You drank less water today than yesterday."

4

Affect/effect

Image: Thought Catalog

Another case of commonly confused words is "affect" and "effect." In addition to their similar pronunciation, these two terms also have related meanings, making it even more challenging to distinguish between them.

"To affect" is a verb meaning "to cause a change" or "to influence." For example, you can say, "Cold weather affects my mood." On the other hand, "effect" is a noun that indicates the consequence of an action or change, as in "The storm had a devastating effect on the city." To simplify: "affect" is the action, while "effect" is the result.

5

Me/I

Image: mohammad takhsh

Many times, we tend to say things like, "The teacher gave an assignment to Lily and I." While that's quite common, it's actually a grammatical error.

We know it’s difficult to tell them apart: both are pronouns used to refer to oneself. However, each has a different function. "I" is used as the subject of the sentence (the one performing the action), as in "Sarah and I went to the store." "Me," on the other hand, is used as the object of the sentence (the one receiving the action), as in, "The doctor told Lucas and me to drink more water."

6

Lose/loose

Image: Jozsef Hocza

Another pair of very, very similar words: lose and loose. The key to distinguishing them is understanding what kind of word each one is.

"Lose" is a verb, meaning it always indicates an action (and can be expressed in the past, present, or future tense). For example: "I don't want to lose my keys" or "Joan lost the remote control." On the other hand, "loose" is an adjective, meaning it describes the characteristics, state, or condition of something, as in "I prefer loose pants; tight ones make me uncomfortable."

7

Well/good

Image: René Porter

"I slept well last night" or "I slept good last night"? (Spoiler: it's the first one!) But why? While both "well" and "good" are used to describe something positively, they are different types of words.

"Well" is an adverb, meaning it describes the verb. In the sentence "She sings well," the adverb modifies the verb "sings." Meanwhile, "good" is an adjective, so it describes a noun, as in "She's a really good singer!"

8

Could have/Could of

Image: Ben Mullins

The confusion between "could have" and "could of" is so widespread that many of us sometimes don’t even notice it. This error usually occurs because of the way they sound when pronounced.

When said quickly in conversation, "could have" can sound like "could of." But there's only one correct form: "could have" ("could of" has no grammatical meaning). For example, "I could have done better on the test" is correct, while "I could of done better on the test" is not.

9

Lay/lie

Image: Vladislav Muslakov

Ok, homophones really can cause chaos, and this is the case with the words "lay" and "lie," which also have similar meanings. We must warn you: If you say, "I need to lay down," you're officially guilty!

While both words have to do with position, "lay" requires a direct object (something being placed), whereas "lie" does not. In other words, "lay" means to put something down (it needs an object), while "lie" means to recline or rest (no object needed).

10

Literally

Image: Randy Tarampi

Finally, we have a word that has often been used incorrectly or exaggeratedly in recent times: "literally" — or just "lit" if you're really cool.

According to the dictionary, "literally" means something happened exactly as stated, without exaggeration. However, in modern slang, it's often used to emphasize or dramatize a situation. For example, you might hear someone say, "I literally died laughing." Of course, if they're saying it, then luckily, they didn't literally die!


Pizza Napoletana, anyone?

Which Thousand Islands made the dressing? 10 foods named after places


Published on March 16, 2025


Image: Gor Davtyan

Some dishes are named after people, like Caesar salad or Fettuccine Alfredo, while others are simply a description of their main ingredients, like lobster rolls or clam chowder. However, some famous dishes are named after the cities, regions, or countries where an inspired cook created them. The following 10 go from the obvious to the surprising, so stick around and prepare to crave at least one of these!

1

Buffalo Wings

Image: Clark Douglas

Since buffaloes don’t have wings, it’s safe to assume that the name origin for this delicious treat must come from something else. And, as the story goes, Teressa and Frank Bellissimo of Buffalo, N.Y.’s Anchor Bar created the dish in 1964. Supposedly, the restaurant received a shipment of chicken wings instead of backs and necks, so Teressa put them in the fryer and coated them with tangy hot sauce.

Another version of the story, as told by the couple’s son, Dominic, states that Frank first created the wings on a Friday night to provide his Catholic customers with something to eat when the clock struck midnight during Lent.

2

Philly Cheesesteak: Philadelphia

Image: mateya

Philadelphia’s prodigal lunch, the Philly cheesesteak, is arguably the city’s most famous delicacy. The grilled beef sandwiches were first made in 1930 and served at Pat’s King of Steaks, consisting of just grilled beef and white onion on a toasted roll, though provolone cheese was added to the recipe in the 1940s. These days, you’d be hard-pressed to find a deli not selling a cheesesteak in Philadelphia.

3

Thousand Island Dressing

Image: Travis Yewell

A dressing defined by its creamy texture and tangy, salty, and slightly sweet flavor, Thousand Island was supposedly created by Sophia LaLonde in Clayton, N.Y. Her husband, George LaLonde Jr., was a fishing guide through the Thousand Islands in the St. Lawrence River and provided meals for his tour parties. One part of the meal included "Sophia’s Sauce," a recipe that was later shared with the owners of the Herald Hotel. There, the dressing was first served to the public, where it was given its present-day name.

4

Spaghetti Bolognese

Image: Homescreenify

A hearty pasta recipe, spaghetti bolognese was named after its place of origin, the city of Bologna, Italy. This meat-based sauce, very commonly used across the world to accompany noodles, is known to Italians as ragù alla Bolognese, but in the city of Bologna itself, the dish is known simply as ragù.

While the Bolognese sauce is a staple in Italian cuisine, the version served with spaghetti is more of an American adaptation. The Italian version is traditionally served with pasta like tagliatelle or pappardelle. The sauce is often used in lasagna as well.

5

Frankfurters

Image: Mateusz Feliksik

A city in southwest Germany, Frankfurt, is responsible for these delicious sausages, also known as hot dogs in the United States and Europe. Traditional Frankfurters are made from a blend of pork and beef. The meat is finely ground, mixed with salt, spices, and other seasonings, and then stuffed into a casing.

These sausages typically served in a bun, later became known as hot dogs, franks, wieners, or weenies. Nowadays hot dogs are a staple at American barbecues, baseball games, and street food vendors.

6

Brussels Sprouts

Image: Keenan Loo

A wild cabbage that thrived in the moderate climate of Brussels, Belgium, the sprouting vegetable originated in that city and is named after it. The Netherlands later became the largest exporter of Brussels sprouts, although they are currently grown around the world, including the U.S.

Brussels sprouts have a slightly bitter taste and a firm texture. When cooked properly, Brussels sprouts can be tender with a slightly nutty or sweet flavor. They are a traditional vegetable in Belgian cuisine, often included in festive and seasonal dishes.

7

Hamburger

Image: Nathan Dumlao

One would be forgiven to believe that such a quintessentially American dish as the hamburger was created in the United States but the beef patty that goes inside the bun was actually created in Germany. A local snack in the city of Hamburg named frikadelle, was served on its own. However, Americans developed the sandwich we know and love today by placing the patty inside a bun with salad. The dish’s popularity soared and has become one of the most enduring foods of the past 250 years.

8

Champagne

Image: Tristan Gassert

The only item in this list that is not a food per se, but a drink, champagne is a prime example of something edible that was named after a place. This sparkling wine is produced exclusively in the Champagne region of France and has forever been associated with luxury.

In its early days, champagne was enjoyed only by French royalty, but today it is celebrated by millions of people around the world on special occasions.

9

Chicken Kyiv

Image: Budi Puspa Wijaya

The second "only" on this list goes to the dish with a deceiving name. While the Chicken Kyiv is the national dish of Ukraine (of which Kyiv is the capital), its origins are more likely French.

During the early 1900s, French cuisine was very popular across Russia, and Empress Elizabeth sent many of her best chefs to France to study it. One of the dishes brought back and adapted was Cotelettes de volaille, a chicken dish that is very similar to the modern Chicken Kyiv. This dish was served in Kyiv to delegations returning from Berlin after the World Wars.

10

Korean barbecue

Image: Daniel L

A dish that is becoming increasingly popular in the U.S. is the Korean barbecue. This preparation consists of marinated beef rib cross-sections cooked over direct heat. As its name implies, it comes from Korea.

Although Korean barbecue refers to several meat-based Korean entrées, including bulgogi (beef) and spicy pork, the most common type of meat associated with the term is the short rib variety.

Looking for an extra scoop of literary fun?

Learn more with our Word of the day

nihilism

/ˈnaɪəˌlɪzəm/