Making up language

Words that were invented by fiction writers, and now we all use them

Image: yeonhee

Sometimes, preexisting words just don’t cut it for writers. So they invent new ones. That was the case for terms like utopia, robot, and nerd. Whether they grew to be used in philosophical texts or on playgrounds, they have certainly entered our vocabulary. Let’s take a look at 11 examples!

Image: Jamie Street

The word has been many things, from a schoolyard insult to a badge of honor for having certain interests. It first appeared in Dr. Seuss’s 1950 book If I Ran the Zoo, where a strange creature called a "Nerd" appears among other fanciful beasts.

Seuss didn’t define it as brainy or awkward, but within a few years, the word was popping up in slang to describe socially inept people or bookworms.

Image: Shahrooz Shekaraubi

Today, when we say "cyberspace," we mean the intangible digital world we enter when we go online. But the word was coined by sci-fi writer William Gibson in his 1982 short story Burning Chrome.

Gibson later famously described cyberspace as a "consensual hallucination" shared by billions of connected users. The term predates the World Wide Web by nearly a decade, yet it foresaw the immersive, sometimes overwhelming, reality of living digitally.

Image: Markus Winkler

Today, when we say we have "debunked" a myth, we mean that we have exposed it as false. The word itself, however, originated as a literary invention in 1923, coined by American writer William E. Woodward in his book Bunk.

Woodward used debunk to mean stripping nonsense, or "bunk" of its dignity, a definition that closely aligns with how the word is still used today.

Image: ThisisEngineering

Today, we picture robots as everything from Roombas to humanoid androids, but the word itself dates back to a 1920 Czech play, R.U.R. (Rossum’s Universal Robots) by Karel Čapek.

The term comes from robota, meaning "forced labor" or "drudgery." In the play, however, the "robots" were not mechanical but biological constructs, closer to what we might now call clones. Both the term and the concept spread quickly across Europe and the United States, reaching the vocabulary of more and more writers.

Image: Miguel Valencia

When we say something is "utopic," we mean it’s impossibly ideal. The term "utopia" was coined by Sir Thomas More in his 1516 book Utopia, where he described an imaginary island society with perfect laws, harmony, and equality.

But the trick was in the name: in Greek, ou-topos means "no place" while eu-topos means "good place." The word took off quickly, giving us not only "utopia" but also its darker twin, "dystopia," which would dominate much of modern literature.

Image: Michelle Baker

Few words sound as delightful as what they mean, and "serendipity" is one of them. It refers to a happy accident, a lucky discovery made while looking for something else.

The term was coined in 1754 by Horace Walpole, a British writer and politician, inspired by a Persian fairy tale titled The Three Princes of Serendip. In the story, the princes are constantly making discoveries "by accident and sagacity."

Image: De an Sun

Fans of Harry Potter know Lumos as the spell that lights the tip of a wand. J. K. Rowling coined the word by drawing on Latin roots, such as lumen, meaning "light."

"Lumos" has since slipped into everyday use to the point that some smartphone voice assistants recognize it as a command to turn on a device’s flashlight.

Image: Andres Iga

The word hobbit instantly evokes images of small, hairy-footed inhabitants of the Shire, thanks to J. R. R. Tolkien. A trained philologist with a deep fascination for languages, Tolkien coined numerous terms, including hobbit and mithril, that have since entered popular culture.

The word became widely recognized even beyond The Lord of the Rings fan base. While hobbit originally referred to a fictional race in Tolkien’s legendarium, it is now sometimes used informally to evoke something small, cozy, or diminutive in character.

Image: Gaelle Marcel

Today, we use tween to describe the awkward stage between childhood and adolescence, typically covering ages 9 to 12. The word itself, however, traces back to J. R. R. Tolkien, who first introduced the idea of "tweens."

In The Fellowship of the Ring, hobbits in their "tweens" were those between 20 and 33; no longer teenagers, but not yet considered fully adult in hobbit society. Marketers later borrowed the catchy term to describe human preteens, and it stuck.

Image: CHI CHEN

The word "gossip" feels inseparable from modern life. Yet it began as the Old English term godsibb, meaning a "godparent" or a close, trusted companion. It was Geoffrey Chaucer, in The Canterbury Tales, who helped nudge the meaning toward talk and chatter.

Over time, the term drifted further, shifting from "companion" to "idle talk" and, eventually, to its modern association with rumor and speculation.

Image: Sarah Kilian

We all know what it means to be a butterfingers: clumsy, prone to dropping things, with hands seemingly as slippery as if coated in butter. This playful insult is often credited to Charles Dickens, who used it in his novel The Pickwick Papers to mock a character’s poor grip on objects.

Sound smarter today!

Do you have conversational crutches? Here are 12 examples to find out

Everyone, even the most articulate of us, has a few words they lean on while speaking. Linguists often call them discourse markers: expressions that organize ideas, soften opinions, invite agreement, or buy time while the brain catches up with the mouth. They are not necessarily mistakes, but when repeated too often, they can become more noticeable than the message itself. Are any of the following 12 part of your everyday repertoire?

"It was, like, the best concert ever."

Few words are as closely associated with casual speech as "like". Linguists note that it is not merely an empty filler: it can introduce an example, signal approximation, frame a quotation, or give the speaker a brief moment to organize a thought.

The habit becomes a crutch when it appears so often that listeners start counting it. Used sparingly, "like" can make speech sound natural and flexible. Used every few words, it can blur the point and make even a confident speaker sound hesitant or unprepared.

"I literally froze."

Literally originally meant "in a literal sense," but English speakers have also used it figuratively for emphasis for centuries. Charles Dickens, Mark Twain, and F. Scott Fitzgerald all stretched the word beyond strict factual meaning long before social media turned the practice into a public argument.

Today, it often works as an emotional intensifier rather than a precise description. Saying "I literally froze" may simply mean the experience felt overwhelming. The word is not automatically wrong, but constant use weakens its force and makes dramatic statements sound routine.

"It was just... you know... awkward."

Unlike many fillers, "you know" directly involves the listener. It can check whether someone is following, suggest shared knowledge, soften an awkward remark, or help a speaker maintain rapport while searching for the next phrase. In conversation, it often acts as a small request for cooperation.

That usefulness also makes it easy to overuse. When repeated every few seconds, it stops sounding inclusive and begins to resemble a nervous reflex.

"Honestly, I didn't expect that."

Beginning a sentence with "honestly" does not necessarily imply that everything else was dishonest. Linguists often treat it as a stance marker: a word that signals sincerity, emotional investment, or the introduction of a personal opinion. It prepares listeners for something the speaker considers especially direct.

The irony is that repeated announcements of honesty can create suspicion rather than trust. Used occasionally, the word adds emphasis and intimacy. Used before nearly every opinion, it can sound theatrical, defensive, or strangely unnecessary.

"So... here's what happened."

Sentence-opening so is now common in interviews, podcasts, meetings, and everyday conversation. It usually does more than fill silence: it signals that an explanation, answer, summary, or conclusion is about to follow. It helps connect what comes next to what has already been discussed.

The problem appears when every response begins the same way. A useful bridge then becomes a visible habit, and listeners may notice the repetition of so more than the explanation itself. Pausing briefly can often make the answer sound cleaner and more deliberate.

"To be fair, they didn't have much time."

"To be fair" introduces balance, concession, or nuance. Speakers often use it before acknowledging another person’s circumstances, softening criticism, or presenting a competing point of view. That is why the phrase appears so often in debates, reviews, sports commentary, and political discussion.

Its appeal lies in the suggestion of objectivity, but repetition can make that fairness feel automatic rather than thoughtful. When every disagreement begins with the same disclaimer, the phrase loses its diplomatic value and becomes little more than a verbal routine.

"Basically, we ran out of money."

"Basically" promises that a complicated subject is about to be reduced to its essentials. It can be genuinely useful when a speaker needs to summarize a long story, strip away technical detail, or identify the central point.

The usual problem is that many people say "basically" before launching into an explanation that is anything but basic. Used carefully, it clarifies. Used constantly, it becomes a vague shortcut that adds no meaning and may even make the speaker sound less certain about the summary.

"I mean... that's not exactly what I meant."

Few expressions reveal real-time thinking as clearly as I mean. Speakers use it to correct themselves, refine a claim, soften a judgment, or rephrase something that did not come out quite right. It marks the moment when the mind edits a sentence that has already begun to leave the mouth.

That flexibility explains why the phrase is so common, and so easy to repeat unconsciously. Occasional use makes speech sound natural and self-aware. Constant use can make every statement seem provisional and indecisive, as though the speaker is forever revising a thought before fully committing to it.

"That makes sense, right?"

Adding "right?" to the end of a statement turns it into a small request for confirmation. The speaker may be checking comprehension, inviting agreement, or simply making sure the listener remains engaged. It is less a genuine question than a conversational signal that says, "Are you still with me?"

Used occasionally, the tag creates warmth and participation. Attached to nearly every sentence, however, it can undermine authority and make even a strong argument sound uncertain.

"Look, here's the problem."

When "look" begins a sentence, it usually has nothing to do with vision. It acts as an attention signal, warning that a correction, explanation, disagreement, or important point is coming. Politicians, lawyers, coaches, and television commentators favor it because it quickly redirects the room.

The word can be effective, but it also carries a slightly forceful tone. Repeated too often, it may sound impatient or controlling, as though every remark requires special attention.

"At the end of the day, results matter."

Once a literal reference to evening, at the end of the day has become one of English’s best-known business clichés. It now usually means "ultimately," "when everything is considered," or "what matters most." Executives, politicians, and sports commentators have helped make it nearly unavoidable.

The phrase is not incorrect, but familiarity has drained it of freshness. Because it often introduces an obvious conclusion, listeners may hear it as padding rather than insight.

"In terms of cost, it's a great option."

"In terms of" frames the specific angle from which a topic will be discussed: cost, timing, quality, risk, or some other category. It is especially useful in academic, technical, and professional language, where speakers may need to separate several dimensions of the same issue.

Repeating it can make ordinary conversation sound bureaucratic, as though every thought belongs in a report.