Blame evolution: 10 reasons why cats are (not) the worst pets

Cats often get a reputation for being difficult, distant, or unreliable pets. People who grew up with dogs sometimes describe them as cold, stubborn, or uninterested in pleasing anyone. This list looks at familiar cat behaviors that can feel frustrating at first, especially to new owners. Seen more closely, these same traits help explain why cats fit comfortably into many homes and why millions of people continue to choose them as companions year after year. Continue reading to discover that your cat truly loves you!

Calling a cat by name and getting no response is a common experience. Unlike dogs, cats rarely come running just because they are called. This can feel dismissive, even rude, to owners who expect a pet to respond on cue.

What’s often overlooked is that cats evolved as mostly solitary hunters. They did not develop social behaviors centered on following leaders or responding to group signals. Studies and everyday observation show that cats can recognize their names and the sound of their owner’s voice, but they decide for themselves whether to react or not. For many people, this independence means fewer demands for constant interaction and a pet that is comfortable spending time on its own.

Many cat owners know the sound: a slow tap, a pause, and then a cup or pen sliding off the edge of a table. Cats often push objects while watching closely, as if waiting for the result.

This behavior is tied to curiosity and learning. Cats use their paws to test how objects move, whether they roll, wobble, or fall. This kind of testing is connected to hunting instincts, where judging motion and distance matters. While it can be annoying, it also shows that cats stay mentally engaged with their environment instead of simply reacting to commands or routines.

Some cats appear deeply committed to a favorite chair, window, or room, while paying less attention to following their owners around the house. This can be mistaken for emotional distance.

In reality, cats rely heavily on familiar spaces. Territorial behavior is well documented in feline behavior, and known areas provide safety and predictability. Many cats show affection by choosing to remain near trusted people within these familiar spots. Staying close without constant contact is often how cats express comfort and attachment. It looks like indifference. It usually isn’t.

Cats can learn routines, such as using a litter box or recognizing feeding times, but they rarely perform tricks or tasks simply to please people. Compared to dogs, they are often labeled "untrainable." Domestication helps explain this difference. Cats were domesticated much later than dogs and retained more independent behavior. Dogs were bred over thousands of years for cooperation with humans, while cats largely adapted themselves to human environments. For many owners, this means living with an animal whose behavior feels consistent and self-directed, rather than shaped by constant training.

Adult cats sleep a lot—often 12 to 16 hours a day. This pattern comes from their natural rhythm as predators that conserve energy between short periods of activity. Instead of constant attention-seeking, cats rest when nothing demands their focus. For many households, this makes cats easier to live with, especially for people who value quiet or spend part of the day away from home.

Cats frequently refuse foods that dogs would eat without hesitation. They are obligate carnivores, meaning their bodies are designed to rely on nutrients found primarily in meat. They require specific amino acids that plant-based foods do not provide. Their selectiveness reflects a digestive system shaped by evolution, not stubbornness. Once owners understand this, feeding routines often become simpler and more predictable.

Every new couch seems to be noticed immediately. Scratching furniture is one of the most common complaints about cats: sofas, chairs, and rugs often suffer. Scratching serves several purposes. It helps cats stretch muscles, maintain claw health, and mark territory using scent glands in their paws. While scratching can damage household items, the behavior itself supports physical comfort and well-being. Providing appropriate scratching surfaces allows cats to meet this need without constant correction.

Some cats nip during play or petting, especially when stimulation becomes too intense. It feels personal, but it rarely is. In many cases, cats show subtle warning signs first, such as tail flicking, ear movement, or muscle tension. Overstimulation, particularly around sensitive areas like the tail or lower back, triggers these reactions. Owners who learn to read these signals often find that cats communicate boundaries clearly and consistently.

Cats are often active early in the morning or late at night, which can interrupt your sleep. This crepuscular pattern comes from hunting instincts, as small prey animals are active at those times. Even indoor cats retain this rhythm. While it doesn’t always align with human sleep schedules, it also means cats can go about life without constant attention during the day, when many households are busiest.

Cats may ignore attention for long periods and then suddenly want closeness. This shift can feel confusing or inconsistent. They usually approach people when they feel calm and secure. Affection offered on their terms often feels different—and more noticeable—than affection given on demand. For many owners, these moments feel meaningful precisely because they happen by the cat’s choice rather than by routine or training.

Debunked science

10 absurd explanations given in the past for natural phenomena

Image: Philippe BONTEMPS

Before modern science lifted the veil on some of nature’s most baffling phenomena, people relied on what they knew—and when that failed, they invented explanations that now seem spectacularly bizarre. But even if these early ideas now seem strange or even foolish, they helped pave the way for modern science. Each flawed theory pushed curious minds to investigate further and refine how we understand the world. From spontaneous generation to the theory of miasma, here are 10 examples of what people believed not so long ago.

Image: Glenn Carstens-Peters

For centuries, people believed the Earth was a flat disc floating on water. Ancient maps depicted oceans surrounding a flat plane, and falling objects supposedly plummeted straight down to the abyss.

While Aristotle was among the first to argue for Earth’s true shape—observing ships vanishing hull-first over the horizon and the round shadow cast during lunar eclipses—and Eratosthenes later refined these intuitions to calculate the planet’s circumference with remarkable accuracy, the flat-Earth concept still persisted well into the Middle Ages.

Image: Adrian Lange

During the Middle Ages, and for long before, it was believed that maggots, mice, and other creatures could arise spontaneously from mud, rotting meat, or grain.

It wasn’t until the 17th century that Francesco Redi’s experiments disproved this idea: maggots appeared only when flies had access to lay their eggs. Later, Pasteur confirmed that microbes also do not arise spontaneously.

Image: Ganapathy Kumar

Early natural philosophers suspected the tides followed the Moon’s cycle, but without a concept of gravity, they proposed more imaginative mechanisms. One widely repeated idea described the Moon as "breathing" or exhaling a kind of pneumatic force that pulled the seas upward, much like winds or vapors moving through the air.

It wasn’t until Newton’s work in the 17th century that a clear physical explanation emerged, showing that the tides are driven by the gravitational pull of the Moon and Sun acting on Earth’s oceans.

Image: Karl Callwood

Some early natural philosophers suggested earthquakes were caused by giant underground worms or serpent-like creatures shifting through the Earth. The analogy came from observing how smaller burrowing animals disturbed soil and assuming larger unseen versions could shake the ground itself.

As geological science progressed, however, these notions gave way to evidence showing that earthquakes result from the movement and fracturing of Earth’s crust along fault lines.

Image: Lightscape

Early explanations for the northern lights often described them as fires or glowing vapors igniting high in the atmosphere. Some natural philosophers proposed that luminous gases rose from Earth’s surface and caught fire in the upper air, while others compared the lights to reflections from vast, distant flames.

With improved observations, scientists showed that auroras are caused by charged particles from the solar wind interacting with Earth’s magnetic field and energizing atmospheric gases.

Image: Javier Miranda

Some early astronomers—including Jesuit priest Christoph Scheiner—argued that sunspots were actually small planets or satellites orbiting the Sun, preserving the idea of a "perfect" Sun untouched by blemishes.

Galileo, however, tracked their shapes and motions and noticed they transformed and changed irregularly, which meant they were on or very close to the Sun’s surface—so they couldn’t be planets.

Image: Ruvim Noga

People once believed diseases like cholera, plague, and malaria spread through "miasma," or poisonous bad air rising from decaying matter. The theory shaped public health for centuries and even informed major sanitation reforms in the 19th century.

It wasn’t until the work of Snow, Pasteur, and Koch that germ theory replaced miasma, showing that infectious diseases are caused by specific microorganisms—not foul-smelling air.

Image: Kubo Mičuch

Early hydrologists often believed springs were fed by vast underground rivers flowing through hollow channels in the Earth. The idea came from observing surface rivers disappearing into caves and reappearing elsewhere, leading to the assumption that similar large waterways existed everywhere below ground.

Modern hydrogeology shows that most groundwater doesn’t travel in rivers but moves slowly through porous soil and rock, driven by pressure and permeability rather than hidden subterranean channels.

Image: Forsaken Films

For centuries, comets were thought to be atmospheric phenomena—fiery vapors or clouds igniting high in the sky. Even Aristotle’s model placed them in the upper atmosphere, and this view persisted well into the Renaissance.

Until Tycho Brahe’s observations in the 1570s showed that comets had no measurable parallax, it hadn’t been realized that they were actually far beyond the Moon. This helped establish comets as true celestial bodies orbiting the Sun.

Image: Chris Nagahama

Early explanations for magnetism often invoked a "living force" within lodestones, suggesting they possessed a kind of spirit or soul that allowed them to attract iron. Others claimed magnets emitted invisible _effluvia_—mysterious vapors that pulled metals toward them.

William Gilbert’s De Magnete (1600) replaced these ideas with a physical model, showing that magnetism was a natural property of matter and that Earth itself acted like a giant magnet.