Translation and interpretation

10 things you thought were in the Bible, but aren't

What if some of the Bible stories you grew up with aren't exactly what the Bible says? Was the forbidden fruit really an apple? Were there actually three Wise Men? Did "God helps those who help themselves" really come from the Bible? Over centuries, translations, traditions, and famous works of art have added details that became so familiar, we stopped questioning them. But go back to the texts, and some of these stories look surprisingly different. From Eve's "apple" to the date of Jesus' birth, here are 10 familiar parts of the Bible that may not be quite what we remember.

When you picture the Garden of Eden, what fruit comes to mind? Most people imagine an apple, but there's just one problem: the Bible never says it was an apple.

In the Book of Genesis, the fruit is simply called "the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil." The original Hebrew text uses the word peri, which simply means "fruit." The apple connection came centuries later, largely through the Latin translation. The Latin word malum can mean both "apple" and "evil," making it an especially fitting symbol for the story. Over time, that association spread through Christian art and literature. Famous works such as Albrecht Dürer’s 1504 engraving Adam and Eve (also known as The Fall of Man) helped cement the image of Eve holding an apple. Today, it's one of the most famous scenes in history, even though the original biblical text doesn’t identify the fruit as an apple at all.

The story of Jesus' birth is so famous that most of us picture the Three Wise Men, sometimes called the Three Kings, standing beside the manger. But the thing is, over the centuries, the story picked up a few details that aren't actually in the Bible.

In the Gospel of Matthew, the only Gospel that mentions these visitors, they are described simply as Magi from the East. The original Greek word, magoi, referred to learned scholars, astrologers, or priests from Persia or Babylon, not kings. But where did the number three come from? Matthew lists three gifts: gold, frankincense, and myrrh, but never says how many visitors brought them. Over the centuries, people naturally assumed there must have been three Magi, one for each gift. Even their familiar names, Melchior, Caspar, and Balthasar, were added later by Christian tradition. So, neither the number of visitors nor their names appears anywhere in the biblical text.

Whether it's used to motivate a friend, encourage a family member, or push yourself to finally make a difficult decision, "God helps those who help themselves" is one of the most familiar religious sayings in America. But here's the surprise: those words never appear in the Bible.

The idea can be traced to ancient Greek sources, including Aesop’s Fables, where the saying appears in an earlier form: "The gods help them that help themselves." The exact modern wording was written by English politician Algernon Sidney in 1698, but it was Benjamin Franklin who helped make it part of American culture when he included it in his 1736 edition of Poor Richard’s Almanack.

Many teenagers have heard "Cleanliness is next to godliness" when it was time to clean their rooms. But despite sounding like a Bible verse, the phrase never appears in Scripture.

The Bible, particularly Leviticus, does contain extensive laws requiring people to wash their bodies and clothes in certain circumstances, especially before religious rituals. But the famous saying itself came much later. In 1605, Francis Bacon wrote in The Advancement of Learning that "cleanness of body" was connected to reverence for God. Then, in 1786, it was Methodist leader John Wesley who used the wording we recognize today in a sermon: "Cleanliness is indeed next to Godliness." Over time, the phrase became a familiar saying that many people simply assumed came from the Bible.

When it comes to famous dates, December 25 may be the most recognizable of all, universally associated with Christmas. But here's the surprising part: the Bible never gives any specific date for Jesus' birth.

The Gospels of Matthew and Luke describe the Nativity but never provide a calendar date, so how did December 25 become Christmas? There are two leading theories. The first is that the Roman Church was celebrating Christmas on December 25 by 336 AD, during Constantine's reign, possibly choosing the date to coincide with existing Roman winter festivals and make it easier to convert the empire to Christianity. The second points to an early Christian tradition that calculated Jesus' birth date from the supposed date of his crucifixion, eventually arriving at December 25.

The story of Jonah and the Whale is so famous that it has appeared literally or symbolically in innumerable works of art and literature, from Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel ceiling (1508-1512) to Herman Melville's 1851 novel Moby-Dick. But there's a small problem with the title we've given it: the Bible doesn’t actually say it was a whale.

In the Old Testament, the original Hebrew text of Jonah 1:17 uses the words dag gadol, meaning "great fish" or "large fish"; it doesn't identify the creature as a whale, or even specify what kind of fish it was. Most modern English translations therefore stick with "great fish," but the familiar "whale" interpretation developed through older translations and later European tradition, eventually becoming so widespread that "Jonah and the Whale" became the name almost everyone recognizes.

Just as we've always pictured the forbidden fruit as an apple, many of us also assume the serpent in the Garden of Eden is the devil himself. But the original story is a little more complicated.

A plain reading of Genesis depicts the creature simply as a serpent or snake, using the Hebrew word nachash. It describes the serpent as clever and crafty, but it never calls it Satan or explicitly identifies it as the devil. So where did the connection come from? The answer comes from later parts of the Bible, particularly the New Testament. In Revelation 12:9 and 20:2, Satan is called "the ancient serpent" (ho ophis ho archaios in Greek), connecting him to the snake of Eden. Over time, Christian tradition applied that later connection back to Genesis, leading to the familiar belief that the serpent was Satan himself.

Many of us remember Samson for his legendary strength and the long hair that was said to be the source of his power. His story with Delilah is one of the Bible's most famous tales of betrayal, but there's one detail some people may have gotten wrong: Delilah didn't actually cut his long hair.

In Judges 16:19, Delilah has Samson's hair shaved while he sleeps on her lap. The text says she called for a man to do the shaving; it never says she did it herself. Yet paintings, films, and other retellings have often shown Delilah wielding the scissors herself, cementing that image in popular culture. It can be considered a small detail, but it’s a great example of how easily familiar Bible stories can pick up elements that aren't actually in the original text.

Many of us think of the Bible as a single book, written at one particular time by one author, or perhaps a handful of them. After all, that's how it looks when you pick one up in a hotel room, but its history is far more complicated.

The Bible is actually a collection of books written by over 40 authors over roughly 1,500 years, from about 1400 BC to AD 100. The exact number of books varies by religious tradition: Protestant Bibles contain 66 books, while Catholic and Orthodox traditions include additional books. Across these different traditions, the writings were produced by kings, prophets, fishermen, and scholars in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. They also span a tremendous range of literary styles, including history, poetry, songs, laws, letters, and prophecy. So while we hold it as one book today, the Bible is actually a collection of many different writings produced across centuries.

Many people assume that at least a few original fragments of the Bible must still exist somewhere. It would be incredible if they did, but none of the original manuscripts, known as autographs, have survived.

The earliest biblical texts were written on fragile materials such as papyrus and animal skins, which could deteriorate through humidity, heat, handling, and simple age. Wars, fires, and other destruction also contributed to their disappearance. So how do we know what the originals said? Through a technique called textual criticism: expert scholars compare thousands of handwritten copies, ancient translations, and quotations from early Christian writers. When they find passages that match across different sources, or differences that reveal how a text changed over time, they can work backward to determine what the original most likely said, even though the original manuscripts themselves are gone.

LATIN LEGAL LINGO

Do You Want To Sound Like a Lawyer?

Image: Tingey Injury Law Firm

In the field of legal speech, Latin expressions are of everyday use. And it’s no surprise that more than just aqueducts and conquering empires, the Romans also laid the groundwork for modern-day law one expression at a time. That’s right, Latin may be a dead language, but its influence in the legal world is still going strong.

Grab your gavels and don your thinking caps as we explore ten Latin expressions that continue to shape the world of law today.

Image: Unsplash+

Let’s kick things off with a legal heavyweight: habeas corpus. This Latin phrase translates to "you shall have the body," and it is all about protecting an individual’s right to be free from unlawful detention by compelling authorities to produce the detained individual before a court, thereby ensuring their right to challenge the legality of their imprisonment.

From the Magna Carta to modern-day constitutional democracies, habeas corpus remains a cornerstone of due process and the rule of law.

Image: Emil Kalibradov

Life is not always easy, and some groups are more vulnerable than others. Regardless, we might all go through a process that we need but can’t afford. That is when "pro bono" comes into play. This Latin expression refers to lawyers serving the cause of justice without expectation of monetary reward. In other words, they work for free.

The literal translation is "for the good," pro bono work embodies the noble ethos of providing legal assistance to those unable to afford it. Whether advocating for marginalized communities or social causes, lawyers uphold the spirit of pro bono as proof of commitment to equality.

Image: Saúl Bucio

You have surely heard the saying "Actions speak louder than words." And this is also the case in the world of court and justice. But in this case, "actions" can be changed for "evidence" because evidence can speak for itself, that is the essence of this saying.

This legal doctrine shifts the burden of proof onto the defendant when an injury or accident is so inherently indicative of negligence that no further evidence is required. From medical malpractice to product liability cases, res ipsa loquitur serves as a powerful tool in the pursuit of justice.

Image: Kenny Eliason

Have you ever felt your teacher, or your kids’ teachers, were a second mom or dad? Well, that is because they are often acting "in loco parentis." This expression describes how institutions like the school are granted the authority and responsibility to act in the place of parents.

Whether supervising students on a field trip or disciplining a wayward pupil, educators assume the role of surrogate parents exercising care and authority in loco parentis.

The Latin expression maxim underscores the delicate balance between parental rights and institutional duties in shaping the minds and futures of the next generation.

Image: Cytonn Photography

More often than not, things are different in practice than they are on paper, and for those cases, we are to thank the Latin language for giving us the "de facto" expression. Beneath the veneer of legal formalities lies the undeniable truth of "de facto" arrangements, which acknowledges the practical reality of a situation, despite the lack of official recognition.

For example, we all know that couple who has been living together for ages, but they aren’t married. This expression sheds light on the gap between legal status and lived experiences, urging policymakers and jurists to confront the complexities of social dynamics beyond mere legal constructs.

Image: Unsplash+

Have you ever heard the expression "First impressions are everything"? Well, that’s the essential idea behind "prima facie." Translated, this Latin expression means "at first sight," which is why we think of first impressions.

Prima facie describes a fact or a presumption of fact that is, in itself, regarded as true unless it can be disapproved or rebutted later in the process. For example, in the case of evidence, prima facie evidence is considered true but it is subject to further investigation.

From civil lawsuits to criminal prosecutions, presenting a prima facie case lays the foundation for subsequent legal proceedings.

Image: Dayne Topkin

Have you ever wondered what happens when the judge and one lawyer have a private chat? In the hushed corridors of legal proceedings, "ex parte" motions and communications unfold away from the prying eyes of opposing parties.

Latin for "from one party," ex parte interactions occur when one side seeks relief from the court without the presence or participation of the other party.

While it is necessary in certain urgent or sensitive circumstances, this is synonymous with having secret meetings, so it raises concerns about fairness and transparency.

Image: Unsplash+

Think of your favorite dish or your favorite recipe, there is always that one ingredient you can’t do without, isn’t that so? Well, that is the sine qua non of the recipe. In the legal world, "sine qua non" stands for those elements which are crucial, and without which the entire case would crumble.

From contract law to causation analysis, identifying the sine qua non of a case claim clarifies the essential link between cause and effect. The sine qua non elements are those that are indispensable and make everything come together because they are absolutely necessary.

Image: Scott Graham

We all have problems and, since each problem is unique, each solution has to be so in some way. That is when you need an "ad hoc" approach**, a customized solution to fit your needs perfectly**.

In the field of legal proceedings, this approach is essential and flexibility is paramount. Ad hoc, which translates to "for this situation", describes those custom-tailored solutions arranged for specific issues or requirements that arise in the process.

Whether forming ad hoc committees or crafting ad hoc agreements, legal practitioners take this approach to demonstrate adaptability and resourcefulness.

Image: Unsplash+

This list will end with a caution: caveat emptor! When you are shopping for something, it is always a good idea to keep your eyes open for any tricks, which means, you are responsible for checking things out before you pay any money.

This Latin expression translates to "let the buyer beware" and it places responsibility on consumers as they should exercise caution and discretion. Even if consumer protection laws offer some safeguards, caveat emptor reminds us that informed buyers are empowered buyers.